The project Bridge is co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Servicio Espanol para la Internacionalizacion de la Educacion (SEPIE). Neither the European Union nor the National Agency SEPIE can be held responsible for them. -- Number: 2025-1-ES01-KA220-HED-000359236 --

LEVEL 1. IDEM: Inclusion, Diversity, Equity in Mobility

BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.1. Structural and intersectional inequalities that shape inclusion and social cohesion


What problem does it address?

Students with disabilities, a refugee background or first-generation status are largely absent from Erasmus+ and other physical mobility programmes. IDEM identifies 'invisible walls' of self-exclusion: fear of discrimination, financial insecurity, language barriers and missing role models lead students to see mobility as 'not for them', while university support services remain scarce, hard to find or underused.

What does it propose?

IDEM, run by the Unite! European University Alliance, uses Design-Based Thinking bootcamps in which underserved students and mobility staff co-create inclusive services. The outputs are open, modular resources: the IDEM Guidelines and Toolkit for International Offices, the IDEM Squad peer network, student-led IDEM Clubs and the role of an Inclusion Officer, backed by longitudinal questionnaires.

Why is it an inspiring practice?
  • • Reframes 'under-represented' students as 'underserved', placing responsibility on the institution.
  • • Students with lived experience of exclusion co-design mobility services on an equal footing with staff.
  • • Addresses psychological barriers as well as administrative ones: self-exclusion, anxiety, lack of role models.
  • • Works across five universities of a European alliance, so solutions are harmonised and transferable.
  • • All tools are published as Open Educational Resources under Creative Commons licences.
Resources you'll find
  • • IDEM Guidelines: evidence-based roadmap for mobility and support-service managers
  • • IDEM Toolkit: modular package for peer networks, student clubs and an Inclusion Officer
  • • Four IDEM Wall Magazines visualising psychological safety and 'underserved' students
  • • IDEM Squad platform for peer mentoring based on lived experience
  • • Bootcamp Reports documenting self-exclusion challenges and prototyped solutions
  • • Video testimonials of students who overcame barriers to mobility
Featured results
87
participants in the co-creation bootcamps
41
students actively involved in the bootcamps
30
staff and students trained in inclusion (Grenoble 2022)
5
service prototypes, incl. IDEM Squad and IDEM Clubs
68.2
per cent of participants gave the bootcamps the top rating
What can visitors learn?
• How self-exclusion works as a structural barrier and how institutions can counter it
• How to run a Design-Based Thinking bootcamp that co-creates services with students
• How to map a student's mobility experience (before, during, after) to find pain points
• How peer networks, safe spaces and an Inclusion Officer can be built into International Offices
• How disability, refugee background and first-generation status intersect in shaping access to mobility

LEVEL 2. EXPLORE BEST PRACTICE

Introduction

IDEM (Inclusion, Diversity, Equity in Mobility) was an Erasmus+ project of the Unite! European University Alliance, coordinated by Technische Universität Darmstadt (2022–2025). It tackled the exclusion of students with disabilities, a refugee background or first-generation status from international mobility. In two co-creation bootcamps in Barcelona (2022) and Lisbon (2024), 87 students and staff prototyped five services and produced open Guidelines, a Toolkit, Wall Magazines and a peer-support platform.

  • Coordinating organisation: Technische Universität Darmstadt (Germany)
  • Participating countries: Finland (FI), France (FR), Germany (DE), Italy (IT), Portugal (PT), Spain (ES)
  • Duration: February 2022
  • BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.1. Structural and intersectional inequalities that shape inclusion and social cohesion
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
  • SDG 4: Quality Education
  • SDG 5: Gender Equality
  • SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

The Challenge

What social issue does it address?

Despite European frameworks that promote inclusion, students with disabilities, a refugee background or first-generation status rarely take part in physical mobility programmes such as Erasmus+. Interest is there, yet many students disqualify themselves in advance, fearing discrimination, financial insecurity, language problems and isolation, while existing support services are often hard to find, opaque or inaccessible.

Why is it important?

Germany has established inclusion structures, yet socio-economic stratification and migrant background still shape access to and success in higher education, and the federal division of competences hinders uniform inclusive policies. Disadvantaged students thus face barriers long before mobility is even considered.

How does it contribute to the BRIDGE Challenge?

IDEM responds to Challenge A1 (structural and intersectional inequalities affecting social inclusion and cohesion) by treating disability, refugee background, first-generation status and precarity as overlapping barriers, and by assigning the responsibility for removing them to the institutions themselves.

How does it work?

An Inclusion Training for 30 staff and students (Grenoble, 2022) was followed by two intensive bootcamps (Barcelona 2022, Lisbon 2024) using Design-Based Thinking and User Journey Mapping. Underserved students and mobility coordinators co-designed services, which were piloted and evaluated through satisfaction surveys. Longitudinal questionnaires with 35 students and 'Retrospectives' fed into the Guidelines and Toolkit.

What might inspire you?
Ideas for adaptation
  1. Use student journey mapping to reveal where exclusion begins, often before an application.
  2. Replace 'under-represented' with 'underserved' and discuss what this shift demands of institutions.
  3. Run short co-creation workshops in which students and staff prototype solutions together.
  4. Build peer-mentoring structures so that students learn from others with similar backgrounds.
  5. Treat psychological safety as an explicit learning outcome of an activity.
  6. Analyse how disability, refugee status and first-generation background intersect.
  7. Publish teaching outputs as open resources so that other institutions can adapt them.
  8. Collect feedback before, during and after an activity to trace changes over time.