The project Bridge is co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Servicio Espanol para la Internacionalizacion de la Educacion (SEPIE). Neither the European Union nor the National Agency SEPIE can be held responsible for them. -- Number: 2025-1-ES01-KA220-HED-000359236 --

LEVEL 1. FREASCO – Free from Sexism & Harassment at School

BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.1. Structural and intersectional inequalities that shape inclusion and social cohesion


What problem does it address?

Schools and universities across Europe lack systematic strategies to prevent, detect and respond to sexism, sexual harassment and homophobic bullying. Normative commitments on gender equality exist, but institutions have no operational means to diagnose their own gaps, and the available resources remain scattered across national contexts, languages and institutional traditions.

What does it propose?

FREASCO built a dual system: an online Self-Assessment Tool through which schools and universities evaluate their performance across five strategic areas, and a database of 177 catalogued resources drawn from 14 countries. Assessment scores return tailored resource recommendations, so that diagnosis leads directly to improvement, while a guideline in five languages and a mobile application complete the system.

Why is it an inspiring practice?
  • • It shifts institutions from reactive incident management to proactive diagnosis of their own performance gaps.
  • • It treats the absence of self-assessment capacity as itself a form of institutional complicity with gender inequality.
  • • It links diagnosis to action: assessment scores return tailored resources, not only a score.
  • • It consolidates 177 resources from 14 countries into a single classified, searchable archive.
  • • It works across every level of the institutional hierarchy, from leadership policy to classroom practice.
  • • It addresses gender together with sexual orientation, institutional hierarchy, age and employment status.
  • • Materials are open access and multilingual, removing cost, language and institutional gatekeeping barriers.
  • • The database has a modular architecture, so new resources can be integrated as the evidence base evolves.
Resources you'll find
  • Good Practice Resources Database: 177 resources, 5 strategic areas, 8 target groups (https://freasco.eu/?page_id=20).
  • • Online Self-Assessment Tool on Policy, Educational Environment, Training, Implementation Activities and Leadership (https://freasco.eu/?page_id=392).
  • • Methodological guideline in English, Italian, French, Estonian and Greek.
  • • Mobile application extending access to the educational resources.
  • • National framework reports on Italy, France, Estonia and Greece.
  • • Project website: https://freasco.eu
Featured results
177
Resources catalogued and classified in the Good Practice Resources Database
14
Countries and international contexts from which the resources were drawn
5
Strategic areas structuring both the database and the Self-Assessment Tool
5
Languages of the methodological guideline: English, Italian, French, Estonian, Greek
8
Target groups used to classify the collected resources
What can visitors learn?
• How to structure an institutional self-assessment on gender equality across five strategic areas.
• How to classify prevention resources by strategic area, target group and best-practice criteria.
• How to connect a diagnostic score to concrete improvement resources.
• How institutional responses to harassment differ across Italy, France, Estonia and Greece.
• How to build an open multilingual repository that institutions can keep using after a project ends.
• Why prevention requires acting on policy, climate, training, activities and leadership simultaneously.

LEVEL 2. EXPLORE BEST PRACTICE

Introduction

FREASCO (2021–2023) was a project co-funded by the European Union under the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme, coordinated by the University of Florence with partners in France, Estonia and Greece. It produced an integrated system for preventing sexism, sexual harassment and homophobic bullying in schools and universities: a database of 177 catalogued resources, an online Self-Assessment Tool structured around five strategic areas, a guideline in five languages and a mobile application.

  • Coordinating organisation: University of Florence – FORLILPSI Department
  • Participating countries: Estonia (EE), France (FR), Greece (GR), Italy (IT)
  • Duration: 2021 - 2023
  • BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.1. Structural and intersectional inequalities that shape inclusion and social cohesion
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
  • SDG 4: Quality Education
  • SDG 5: Gender Equality
  • SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
  • SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Secondary Challenges
  • A.2. Gap between regulatory frameworks, institutional discourses and actual inclusion practices

The Challenge

What social issue does it address?

Sexism, sexual harassment and homophobic bullying in educational settings are not isolated incidents but structural inequalities intersecting gender, sexual orientation, institutional hierarchy and age. Institutions reproduce and normalise them through the absence of systematic prevention, detection and response mechanisms, which disproportionately affects women, LGBTQ+ people and students in subordinate positions.

Why is it important?

Educational institutions are tasked with promoting democratic citizenship and social cohesion, yet without the capacity to diagnose their own compliance gaps they remain locked in a cycle of institutional denial and inaction, and discriminatory behaviours persist unchallenged.

How does it contribute to the BRIDGE Challenge?

It addresses Level A Challenge 1 by making structural inequality measurable at institutional level: five strategic areas turn an abstract normative commitment into a diagnosable, improvable and monitorable dimension of how a school or university actually operates.

How does it work?

Partners collected resources under standardised inclusion criteria and catalogued 177 of them on an Airtable platform, classified by type, strategic area, target group, language, country of origin and best practice criteria. The online Self-Assessment Tool was designed around the same five areas, so that institutional scores return filtered recommendations; the database is also accessible directly as an open library.

What might inspire you?
Ideas for adaptation
  1. Ask what your institution lacks before asking what individuals did wrong.
  2. Assess policy, climate, training, activities and leadership together, not separately.
  3. Turn an assessment score into a list of usable resources, not just a number.
  4. Classify resources by who needs them: leadership, teachers, administrators, researchers.
  5. Look at how other countries handle the same problem before designing your protocol.
  6. Translate the guideline: prevention stops at the language barrier.
  7. Treat homophobic bullying and sexism as one structural problem, not two.
  8. Remember that institutional hierarchy is itself a risk factor in harassment.
  9. Build the archive so that others can keep adding to it after the project ends.
  10. Make gender equality something an institution can measure about itself.
Resources created

FREASCO Good Practice Resources Database

Interactive digital resource

An online database cataloguing 177 resources on combating gender-based violence, sexism and homophobic bullying in educational settings, collected by the partners under standardised inclusion and exclusion criteria. Resources come from the four partner countries and from ten further national and international contexts, and are classified by type (publications, guidelines, tools, projects, guides, online courses), strategic area, target group, language, country of origin and best practice criteria, with full metadata including author, year, description and link. Publications of studies and research form the largest category. The database can be consulted either as an open library or through the filtered recommendations generated by the Self-Assessment Tool.

Teaching staff, Researchers, Professionals, Policy Makers

https://freasco.eu/?page_id=20

FREASCO Online Self-Assessment Tool

Interactive digital resource

An online instrument enabling schools and universities to evaluate their own institutional performance in preventing and responding to sexism, sexual harassment and homophobic bullying. The assessment is organised around five strategic areas: Policy (institutional rules and procedures for identifying and combating violence); Educational Environment (improving institutional climate towards inclusion); Training (knowledge-building on combating violence and harassment); Implementation Activities (research and project models for practical interventions); and Leadership (equal opportunities and gender discrimination within institutional hierarchies). It generates individualised scores linked to tailored recommendations drawn from the project database.

Teaching staff, Professionals, Policy Makers

https://freasco.eu/?page_id=392

FREASCO multilingual methodological guideline

Digital publication

A guideline produced in English, Italian, French, Estonian and Greek, providing information, concrete suggestions, good practice examples and strategies for implementing a gender mainstreaming approach at institutional level. It is designed to accompany the Self-Assessment Tool by translating diagnostic findings into actionable recommendations for schools and universities, and it functions as a standardised reference for institutional gender mainstreaming across the different national contexts covered by the project.

Teaching staff, Researchers, Professionals, Policy Makers

https://freasco.eu/?page_id=1880

FREASCO multilingual methodological guideline

Interactive digital resource

Reports produced by each partner documenting the legislative, institutional and practical context of gender-based violence prevention in their country. They include the Italian analysis of resource typologies, the French identification of university-level response protocols, the Greek analysis combining national statistics with legal framework analysis, and the Estonian integration of the 2020 national survey on gender-based and sexual harassment in universities within a European comparative framework.

Researchers, Professionals, Policy Makers

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sgW8MbIKKUl7Z-oElo7EMPIQvrvJfnFQ/view