The project Bridge is co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Servicio Espanol para la Internacionalizacion de la Educacion (SEPIE). Neither the European Union nor the National Agency SEPIE can be held responsible for them. -- Number: 2025-1-ES01-KA220-HED-000359236 --

LEVEL 1. Kraków University-City Liaison Model

BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.6. Deficits in democratic participation, representation and inclusive governance


What problem does it address?

In Kraków, university-city cooperation was fragmented, ad hoc and dependent on informal contacts. Academic communities - especially doctoral candidates, early-career researchers and international scholars - had limited access to municipal consultation and policy processes, while no stable two-way mechanism connected academic expertise with city governance.

What does it propose?

The practice establishes a bilateral liaison system linking the City of Kraków with the Doctoral Association of the Jagiellonian University. Formally appointed representatives on both sides maintain continuous communication, coordinate consultations, channel academic knowledge into policy, represent doctoral communities, and develop joint initiatives such as internships and living-lab activities.

Why is it an inspiring practice?
  • • A symmetrical, two-way liaison model replaces one-sided or ad hoc consultation.
  • • The mechanism is low-cost because it uses existing municipal and academic structures.
  • • Formal mandates improve continuity, accountability and resilience beyond individual contacts.
  • • Doctoral candidates and early-career researchers gain structured access to governance processes.
  • • The model links academic knowledge transfer with practical public-policy cooperation.
  • • Living-lab activities connect co-creation and experimentation with real urban challenges.
  • • The approach is scalable and adaptable to other university cities.
Resources you'll find
  • • Order No. 2444/2025 of the President of Kraków - Mayor's Plenipotentiary mandate.
  • • Resolution No. 5/2026 of the Doctoral Association of the Jagiellonian University.
  • • Order No. 368/2026 - Municipal Paid Student Internship Programme.
  • • Municipal internship programme information and BIP materials.
  • • Consultation, communication and monitoring records generated by the liaison structure.
  • • Podcast/video presentation explaining the initiative and its governance rationale.
Featured results
2
Institutional sides covered by formal liaison arrangements: municipal and academic.
1
Mayor's Plenipotentiary mandate established by Order No. 2444/2025.
1
TD UJ liaison framework formalised by Resolution No. 5/2026.
1
Municipal Paid Student Internship Programme introduced through Order No. 368/2026.
1
Ongoing consultation, communication and monitoring framework operationalised.
What can visitors learn?
• How to institutionalise university-city dialogue through reciprocal liaison roles.
• How formal mandates can reduce dependence on informal networks and individual relationships.
• How to strengthen representation of doctoral, early-career and international researchers.
• How to build feedback loops between academic expertise and municipal policy-making.
• How paid internships and living labs can turn institutional dialogue into practical participation.
• Which conditions support transfer of the model to other European university cities.

LEVEL 2. EXPLORE BEST PRACTICE

Introduction

Kraków developed a bilateral university-city liaison model to replace fragmented, informal cooperation with a stable governance interface. A Mayor's Plenipotentiary for cooperation with the scientific and academic community is matched by liaison roles within the Doctoral Association of the Jagiellonian University. The system supports reciprocal communication, representation, consultation, knowledge transfer and joint initiatives, including internships and living-lab activities.

  • Coordinating organisation: Municipality of Kraków & TD UJ
  • Participating countries: Poland (PL)
  • Duration: 2025
  • BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.6. Deficits in democratic participation, representation and inclusive governance
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
  • SDG 4: Quality Education
  • SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
  • SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
  • SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
  • SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals
Secondary Challenges
  • A.2. Gap between regulatory frameworks, institutional discourses and actual inclusion practices
  • A.4. Fragmented management of cultural diversity and weak institutionalisation of intercultural dialogue

The Challenge

What social issue does it address?

The practice addresses fragmented university-city relations and unequal access to local governance. Doctoral candidates, early-career researchers and international scholars were weakly represented in municipal consultation, while academic expertise reached policy processes irregularly. Cooperation depended heavily on individual contacts rather than stable institutional channels.

Why is it important?

Universities are major sources of knowledge, innovation and civic capacity, yet their contribution to local policy can remain weak when cooperation is informal. Stable representation gives academic communities a clearer voice, improves continuity and accountability, and helps public authorities use evidence more systematically.

How does it contribute to the BRIDGE Challenge?

The model operationalises BRIDGE priorities by reducing the gap between formal cooperation and actual practice, strengthening democratic participation and representation, and institutionalising dialogue across different academic and public-sector communities through reciprocal, accountable communication channels.

How does it work?

The City of Kraków and TD UJ appoint formal liaison representatives with complementary mandates. They exchange information, coordinate consultations, represent academic interests in advisory bodies, channel research and expertise into municipal processes, archive cooperation records and develop joint actions. The city also serves as a living-lab environment for testing knowledge-based solutions.

What might inspire you?
Ideas for adaptation
  1. Use liaison roles to teach collaborative governance through a real institutional case.
  2. Compare one-sided consultation with a reciprocal two-way representation model.
  3. Map stakeholders and power asymmetries in university-city relations.
  4. Analyse how formal mandates can turn informal cooperation into durable practice.
  5. Use the case to discuss representation of doctoral and international researchers.
  6. Explore living labs as settings for co-creating and testing public solutions.
  7. Design feedback loops connecting academic expertise with local policy decisions.
  8. Evaluate the transferability of low-cost governance innovations to other cities.
  9. Link experiential civic learning with internships in public administration.
  10. Debate how inclusion, accountability and evidence use shape local governance.