The project Bridge is co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Servicio Espanol para la Internacionalizacion de la Educacion (SEPIE). Neither the European Union nor the National Agency SEPIE can be held responsible for them. -- Number: 2025-1-ES01-KA220-HED-000359236 --

LEVEL 1. Community-Based MHPSS for Student Well-Being

BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.2. Gap between regulatory frameworks, institutional discourses and actual inclusion practices


What problem does it address?

Polish universities face a growing student mental-health crisis alongside fragmented and often inaccessible psychosocial support. Evidence since 2020 shows high levels of anxiety, depression, stress and suicidal risk, while many students report low awareness of available services, stigma and limited influence on institutional well-being policies.

What does it propose?

The practice proposes a community-based Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) model combining prevention, referral, anti-stigma education, student participation, institutional reform, local depression alliances and digital tools. It adapts the European Alliance Against Depression approach to higher education and links universities with students, NGOs and mental-health professionals.

Why is it an inspiring practice?
  • • Treats student mental health as an institutional and community issue, not only an individual one.
  • • Combines evidence-based MHPSS with student co-creation and participatory governance.
  • • Links universities, NGOs, professionals and local communities in depression-prevention alliances.
  • • Uses accessible digital tools alongside face-to-face support.
  • • Offers a low-cost and transferable model for European universities.
Resources you'll find
  • • Scientific article on MHPSS and student well-being in Polish universities.
  • • National student mental-health reports by NZS and PSSiAP.
  • • European Alliance Against Depression methodologies and materials.
  • • iFightDepression digital self-help and awareness platform.
  • • Awareness campaigns, webinars, workshops and institutional recommendations.
Featured results
3
BRIDGE Social Challenges directly addressed: A.2, A.4 and A.6
6
Core components integrated into the intervention model: psychosocial support and referral, anti-stigma education, student participation, institutional self-reflection, community depression alliances, and digital mental-health tools
3
Implementation phases developed since 2020: diagnosis and awareness, community mobilisation and alliances, and institutionalisation/policy work
4
Institutional partners driving the initiative: Maria Grzegorzewska University, the EAAD (European Alliance Against Depression) network, the Independent Students' Union (NZS) and PSSiAP
1
Evidence-based digital tool integrated into the model: the iFightDepression platform, aligned with the EAAD methodology
What can visitors learn?
• How to move from reactive counselling to preventive, systemic well-being support.
• How students can co-create university mental-health policies.
• How community alliances can reduce stigma and strengthen referral pathways.
• How institutional culture and academic pressure affect psychosocial well-being.
• How digital tools can complement inclusive mental-health support.

LEVEL 2. EXPLORE BEST PRACTICE

Introduction

This practice responds to deteriorating student mental health and insufficient institutional capacity for accessible, preventive and community-oriented support in Polish higher education. It combines evidence-based MHPSS, student-led advocacy, local alliances against depression, institutional reform and digital tools to strengthen prevention, reduce stigma and embed well-being more firmly in university governance.

  • Coordinating organisation: Maria Grzegorzewska University
  • Participating countries: Poland (PL)
  • Duration: 2020
  • BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.2. Gap between regulatory frameworks, institutional discourses and actual inclusion practices
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
  • SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
  • SDG 4: Quality Education
  • SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
  • SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
  • SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals
Secondary Challenges
  • A.4. Fragmented management of cultural diversity and weak institutionalisation of intercultural dialogue
  • A.6. Deficits in democratic participation, representation and inclusive governance

The Challenge

What social issue does it address?

University students face high levels of anxiety, depression, stress and emotional exhaustion while psychosocial support remains uneven, poorly visible and often reactive. Academic pressure, stigma, unequal access to services and limited student influence over well-being policy can deepen vulnerability, especially for students already facing social, gender or migration-related inequalities.

Why is it important?

Student well-being affects learning, inclusion, retention and participation in academic life. Treating mental health only as an individual clinical issue overlooks institutional conditions that can intensify distress. A preventive and participatory approach can improve access to support, reduce stigma and strengthen universities’ responsibility for healthy learning environments.

How does it contribute to the BRIDGE Challenge?

The practice addresses the gap between institutional commitments and actual inclusion by embedding MHPSS in university structures, while also strengthening dialogue and student participation. It links institutional reform with community alliances, peer engagement and accessible digital resources, turning well-being from a peripheral service into a shared governance responsibility.

How does it work?

The model combines community-based MHPSS, anti-stigma education, student co-creation, institutional self-reflection, local alliances against depression and digital support. Universities work with student organisations, psychologists, NGOs and public-health actors. Evidence and feedback inform recommendations, awareness activities, referral pathways and longer-term well-being governance.

What might inspire you?
Ideas for adaptation
  1. Map structural causes of student distress, not only individual symptoms.
  2. Use student surveys to diagnose gaps in campus mental-health support.
  3. Co-design well-being policies with students and student organisations.
  4. Build referral pathways linking universities with local mental-health services.
  5. Teach mental-health literacy through anti-stigma workshops and campaigns.
  6. Discuss how academic culture, hierarchy and performance pressure affect well-being.
  7. Use peer-support as a complement to professional psychosocial services.
  8. Compare face-to-face and digital support tools such as iFightDepression.
  9. Create local alliances that connect education, health and civil society actors.
  10. Evaluate university well-being policies through participatory feedback.