The project Bridge is co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Servicio Espanol para la Internacionalizacion de la Educacion (SEPIE). Neither the European Union nor the National Agency SEPIE can be held responsible for them. -- Number: 2025-1-ES01-KA220-HED-000359236 --

LEVEL 1. Intercultural Assistants in Kraków Schools

BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.1. Structural and intersectional inequalities that shape inclusion and social cohesion


What problem does it address?

Kraków schools increasingly serve migrant and refugee students who may face language barriers, unfamiliar procedures, cultural differences and unequal access to information and support. Without dedicated mediation, these barriers can reduce participation, parental engagement, educational achievement and trust between families and public institutions.

What does it propose?

The programme deploys trained intercultural assistants in schools as mediators, cultural translators and facilitators. They support students' adaptation, help families navigate educational procedures, strengthen two-way communication, build intercultural competences among staff and connect schools with municipal authorities and NGOs.

Why is it an inspiring practice?
  • • Turns intercultural mediation into an institutional role, not temporary emergency support.
  • • Combines student support, family engagement and school capacity-building.
  • • Treats migrant families as participants rather than passive beneficiaries.
  • • Connects local government, schools and civil society in a sustainable governance model.
  • • Addresses structural inequalities while strengthening dialogue and social cohesion.
  • • Has low infrastructural requirements and strong transferability.
Resources you'll find
  • • Open Kraków Programme 2024–2028.
  • • Municipal diversity-management and equality policy documents.
  • • Training programme and professional guidance for intercultural assistants.
  • • Multilingual educational and information materials.
  • • Association of Intercultural Assistants 'TO MA SENS'.
  • • Audiovisual and public-awareness materials, including 'I Choose Kraków!'.
Featured results
1
Recognised professional role of intercultural assistance embedded in educational settings.
1
Long-term policy integration through the Open Kraków Programme 2024–2028.
3
Core governance sectors linked in sustainable cooperation: schools, municipal authorities and NGOs.
3
BRIDGE challenges directly addressed: A.1, A.4 and A.6.
5
Core intervention components: mediation, individual support, family engagement, staff capacity-building and institutional cooperation.
What can visitors learn?
• How intercultural mediation can become a permanent educational support mechanism.
• How to strengthen two-way communication between schools and migrant families.
• How to reduce structural and linguistic barriers to participation.
• How family engagement can support inclusive educational governance.
• How municipalities, schools and NGOs can co-deliver inclusion policies.
• How the model can be adapted to higher education and lifelong learning.

LEVEL 2. EXPLORE BEST PRACTICE

Introduction

The Kraków Intercultural Assistants Programme is a community-based inclusion model for migrant and refugee students. Trained assistants work between schools, families and public institutions, supporting communication, adaptation and participation while building schools' intercultural capacity. Embedded in Kraków's long-term integration policy, the practice moves beyond one-way language support toward institutionalised mediation, shared governance and sustainable diversity management.

  • Coordinating organisation: Municipality of Kraków
  • Duration: 2020
  • BRIDGE Main Challenge: A.1. Structural and intersectional inequalities that shape inclusion and social cohesion
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
  • SDG 4: Quality Education
  • SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
  • SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
  • SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
  • SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals
Secondary Challenges
  • A.4. Fragmented management of cultural diversity and weak institutionalisation of intercultural dialogue
  • A.6. Deficits in democratic participation, representation and inclusive governance

The Challenge

What social issue does it address?

Migrant and refugee students can have formal access to education while still facing unequal participation because of language barriers, unfamiliar procedures, cultural differences and limited representation. Schools may also lack staff, mediation tools and intercultural competences, producing fragmented communication, weaker trust and social isolation.

Why is it important?

Equal enrolment does not ensure equal participation. Effective mediation helps students adapt, gives families access to information and voice, equips schools to respond to diversity, and reduces risks of exclusion, misunderstanding and educational underachievement while strengthening trust in public institutions.

How does it contribute to the BRIDGE Challenge?

The programme addresses BRIDGE A.1 by reducing structural and intersectional barriers, A.4 by embedding intercultural mediation in school practice, and A.6 by enabling migrant families to participate more actively in educational decision-making and local inclusion processes.

How does it work?

Trained intercultural assistants work directly in schools. They mediate communication, explain procedures, support newly arrived students, engage parents, advise teachers and link schools with municipal services and NGOs. Workshops, multilingual materials, training and supervision build institutional capacity and turn inclusion into a continuous, shared process.

What might inspire you?
Ideas for adaptation
  1. Use mediators to bridge schools, migrant families and public institutions.
  2. Teach the difference between formal access and meaningful participation.
  3. Map language, cultural and institutional barriers to educational inclusion.
  4. Analyse how mediation can rebalance power between institutions and families.
  5. Use multilingual materials to design accessible school communication.
  6. Explore family engagement as a form of inclusive educational governance.
  7. Build intercultural competence through workshops and case-based learning.
  8. Compare emergency support with permanently institutionalised mediation.
  9. Examine municipal-NGO-school partnerships as a local governance model.
  10. Adapt intercultural assistance principles to universities and adult learning.